![]() Of course, I'll play more and maybe get used to all of this nonsense but when I get tired I'll come to Pandora to relax.īy the way, Beyond Earth looks and feels like a Civ5 reskin as I saw in the recent gameplay demo video. After Pandora it's not just bad but horrible. Civ5 lacks many little handy things that Pandora has out of the box like movement orders after using all the movement points, units path (I just couldn't find how I can show where the unit moves to, only cancel the order!) units stacking, taxes (at least from the very beginning), units customization (maybe it's present in later game, dunno) and the worst thing I found in Civ5 is its UI. I know that Civilzation has much more depths but I'm not sure I want to dive into them that deep. Obvious things in Pandora get complicated and just killing in Civ5. I've just played Civ5 as it was released for Linux and what can I say. Rome 2 critics were, guessing, told to review the smoothness, graphics, micro-management, and simplicity. However, Critics nowadays only look at certain aspects of the game they are reviewing, Watch Dogs critics looked at the main points of the game, Open world, Hacking, smoothness, enjoyment. But the main reason Rome 2 failed is people got too impatient, Pre-orders started just flying in, and Sega seeing the opportunity, took it, and decided to release an unfinished game(polishing wise, the base of the game was fantastic, just needed polishing). ![]() ![]() Critics are paid by AAA companies to give good reviews, which explains Watch Dogs, Assassins Creed, CoD, ect., Rome 2 was buggy but fortunately for me, i never had any of the bugs people complained about and I put a lot of hours into it, but it was just lacking to me in some ways, but normally Sega and CA always come back and uppercut us when we think their next game will be horrible after a disatrous game. Game critics on the whole have no ethics and are bought and paid for by the industry they claim to be critical of. ![]() Go look at ROME 2 next day reviews they are like 90+ on average and within the community and even after 12 patches the games AI, specifically siege AI, is basically broken, not bad, broken. Originally posted by in their right minds listens to ANY professional reviewer out there nowadays.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |